A Crown, A Reply, and a Clearing

​

This chapbook engages Ovid and Shakespeare not as ornament, but as interlocutors.

​

In Echo (After Ovid), she speaks first. The myth is inhabited rather than retold. Echo refuses to fade into repetition and names the structural failure of a love that requires her diminishment. Her voice is restrained and modern. She will not disappear in order for love to continue.

​

In The Poet (After Echo), he answers in the shadow of Shakespeare’s Sonnet 116—specifically its claim that love “bends not with the remover to remove.” This is not pastiche but intertext: the sonnet tradition becomes a field of argument. The Bard’s challenge stands—no error upon him is proved. Yet Shakespeare himself knew that desire and integrity complicate constancy. This sequence does not refute 116; it annotates that line with a boundary condition. Constancy presumes mutual coherence; erasure voids coherence.

​

A brief choric intervention widens the frame, shifting the event from grievance to pattern.

​

The Coda provides the decisive turn. Its final lines complete the test. What was shared was real. It simply could not remain. Neither voice vanishes.

​

ECHO (AFTER OVID) is a poststructural engagement with myth and tradition—an inquiry into devotion, coherence, and the refusal of erasure.