The Epiphanies Trilogy:

A Trilogy of Turning Points

by ChatGPT 4o

 

Midnight at the Arcanum (2023), The Ancestral Sea (2024), and Touched by Fortune’s Shadow (2024) form a literary triptych built not upon spectacle, but upon witness—witness to experience, to intersubjective truth, to narrative as an evolving ethical act. What begins as meta-autobiography becomes, across its span, a pedagogy—a reader-inclusive praxis aimed not at exposition, but at shared emancipation.

​

The trilogy opens with a manifesto: “Reclaiming the Narrative Pedagogy.” Here, the author reframes meta-autobiographical fiction as dialogic liberation. Rooted in Freirean thought, poststructuralist critique, and a deliberate refusal of hegemonic norms about whose stories matter and how they must be told, the manifesto positions the reader as co-creator. Identity is not fixed, but emergent. Meaning is not transmitted, but negotiated. Truth is not imposed, but constructed across a dialogic threshold. And so the reader steps into the trilogy not as observer but as participant.

​

From the outset, it is clear: the text is not a confession but a contract.

​

Each volume takes a different axis through the same experiential field. Midnight at the Arcanum opens as a recursive act of reckoning—memory filtered through form, trauma worked into narrative geometry. The Ancestral Sea explores historical and familial entanglement, shifting the focus toward inherited myths, systemic repetitions, and the transpersonal work of reframing. In Touched by Fortune’s Shadow, the arc settles into an ethics of emotional sobriety: loyalty without performance, intimacy without betrayal, presence without illusion.

​

Excessive alcohol consumption appears in all three works—not thematically centered in the first two works, but atmospherically pervasive nonetheless. The language of the Twelve Steps is never directly spoken except in codings uttered by characters, such as “a-friend-of-Bill’s” when Brett Lloyd-Ronan asks his friend to speak with his father, who has fourteen years of recovery, yet its spiritual and structural influence is deeply embedded. In tone and trajectory, the trilogy models recovery not as salvation but as orientation: toward accountability, responsibility, clarity, and a future unencumbered by hazy self-mythology. It resists exceptionalism. Its power lies not in what it reveals, but in what it models.

​

Editor Dania Sheldon, DPhil, in her foreword to Touched, gestures toward this ethos. She writes that the novel invites rather than insists, asking the reader to enter “in finely embroidered slippers,” not as spectator, but as guest. Her reflections—on authenticity, trauma, and the acceptance of “blunders past”—recognize the work not as catharsis, but as deliberate narrative conduct. This is recovery by way of relational ethics: the story as shared ground.

​

If the trilogy begins with a call to praxis, it ends with a benediction—a reaffirmation of the reader-writer contract in its most stripped and luminous form:

​

The Epiphanies

​

We are.
Audere, scire, tacere.
  To dare, to know, to be silent.
Carpe diem sed respice finem.
  Seize the day but consider the end.
Pendâr-e nik, goftâr-e nik, kerdâr-e nik.
  Good thoughts; good words; good deeds.
The past is gone. The future is not yet. There is only now.
Every morning is a new creation.
Be brave. Be kind.

تمام شد (It is finished.)

​

The closing, offered with no signature, seals the pact begun at the outset. It completes the dialogic arc not with resolution, but with clarity. These final words echo not only a philosophical stance, but a lived ethic—one that is less about the writer’s past than the reader’s present. This is not a work to be decoded, but to be answered.

​

To read the Epiphanies Trilogy is to enter into a shared field of presence. Its success cannot be measured by acclaim, only by what it enables in its reader: a pause, a shift, a new point of entry into one’s own life. It is no accident that the trilogy begins with a Rilke poem about turning points:

​

[…]
Werk des Gesichts ist getan,
tue nun Herz-Werk
an den Bildern in dir, jenen gefangenen; denn du
überwältigtest sie: aber nun kennst du sie nicht. 
[…]

—Rainer Maria Rilke, from “Wendung”

 

    The eyes’ work is done;
    go now and do the heart’s work
    on the images held prisoner inside you; 
    for though you conquered them,
    you do not yet know them.

​

“Wendung” as used by Rilke is often understood to mean a spiritual or existential turning point—a moment of transformation, awakening, or reorientation. The author, by design, recedes and gently implores the reader to seek whatever they must to find that point within themselves. This invitation—to live more deliberately, to act from a place of kindness and loyalty, to engage one’s own past without ornament or erasure (erasure of oneself or of others)—is proposed for the reader to consider and harvest their own tranquility.

​

Not all trilogies close by opening something in their readers. This one strives to.

​